The following is an overview of Persisting Misinformation in Complementary Health: Assessing the Reliability and Quality of YouTube-Based Information on the Use of Acupuncture for Chronic Pain. pain According to Greer et al.
Acupuncture is a popular option for relieving chronic pain, but many people seek information on social media before undergoing treatment.
Researchers conducted a retrospective study to evaluate YouTube information about acupuncture for its usefulness, accuracy, and quality for chronic pain management.
They utilized search terms such as “acupuncture for chronic pain” and “acupuncture pain relief” to identify the top 54 videos based on number of views. The video he included was over a minute long, had English audio, had over 7,000 views, and was related to acupuncture.They are rated Determine the usefulness of each video: helpful, misleading, or neutral. The quality and reliability of each video was assessed using established tools such as the modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) tool and the Global Quality Scale (GQS). The average values of video production characteristics, source, mDISCERN, and GQS scores were calculated. Statistical analyzes included comparing continuous results with Student’s t test and categorical results with chi-square test.
Of the 54 videos, 57.4% were found to be legitimate, 14.8% were misleading, and 27.8% were neutral. The mean GQS score and corrected DISCERN score for helpful videos were 3.77±0.67 and 3.48±0.63, respectively, while the mean GQS score and corrected DISCERN score for misleading videos were 2.50±0.53 and 2.38±0.52, respectively. Of the valuable videos, 41.8% were created by medical institutions, but none were misleading. However, 87.5% of misleading videos were created by health media, compared to 25.8% of valuable videos.
The researchers concluded that YouTube content about acupuncture for chronic pain is increasingly requested by patients, but quality, reliable information is often lacking.
sauce: dovepress.com/misinformation-persists-in-complementary-health-evaluating-the-reliabi-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-JPR
